Johannes STEIDL

 

 

 

 

la_wu01

la_wu02 
la_wu03

 

 la_wu04 la_wu05 la_wu07  
   

 

 
     

 

Laokoons Wurf

 

licht wo man keines braucht

eine straßenlaterne, ihrer funktion entkleidet, die ihrer höhe wegen die soziale dimension des platzes aufbricht.

der beleuchtungskörper ist mit einem nest, einer brutstätte verwoben.

die verbindung mit laokoon spricht für skepsis in bezug auf die natur des nestes

 

Laokoon´s brood
light where no-one needs it
a street lamp, undressed of its function whose height breaks far above the social dimensions of the square.

A nest, a hatchery is weaved onto the light fitting.
There is a sceptical connection with Laokoon when regarding the nature of the nest


 

 

 

Johannes Steidl‚s " Laocoön‚s Litter ". No Light on the Anton-Neumayr-Platz. Salzburg, 17.06.-27.10.06

Text by Tania Hölzl

 

 

Salzburg’s Summer Scene, which has been working on a project ironically entitled "Sex, Crime and the City"

this year, has also provided a field for fine art. As a visual marker and intended for public intervention, artists

such as Lois Weinberger, Kai Kuss, Hans Kuppelwieser have already made their appearances under the curatorial

aegis of  the art collectorJosef Neuhauser. This year Johannes Steidl will reutilize the square with the monumental

 and yet almost invisible installation ”Laocoön‚s Litter“ . This consists of a 15 metre high standard street lamp

with a 180 diameter platform fixed at the top of it holding a nest made of liana and ostrich feathers.  An orange

light glows underneath the nest throughout the day. The metaphors are visually unostentatious,  in away easy to

understand, a piece of civilization and a displaced piece of nature. Light. Yet, everything which may seem harmless

 and  peacable on first view soon emerges as an ambivalent commentary and recalcitrant dispute with, on the one

hand, the contemporary cultural players in Salzburg and on the other hand with the situation on a global level.

 


The contextual framework

 

The topological position and the social surroundings of theinstallation characterize a field where examples of

contemporary life ranging from the festival to Red Bull present themselves, a culturally charged square, a

culmination point, a hot spot in the city. We could even talk of a new village square where overlapping and

contradictory practices  take place. What is more significant is the ”multicultural“ utilization of the location,

that is the heterogenous fields and interests debated in this local conflicting areas. the Museum der Moderne,

opened in 2004, is located on the Mönchsberg, which rounds off this square. For Steidl, it is a place which

administrates the past and its blockbusters and the Anton Neumayr Square below has in the meantime come

into the years of the alternative youth cultural Summer Scene with its dance Theatre. Otherwise the bar,

Republic, which is also located there, has become a milestone and the events hall is used for concerts and

cultural events throughout the year. Alone the placing of the nest in no-man’s land between the ”non-space“

of up and down is a  comment from Steidl about what is being debated in the
present polygon of interests.

 

Disappearance and Appropriation, a Parasite.

 

The relative height of the nest at the club with it’s ready-made Character, makes sure that Laocoön‚s litter is

not really perceived by many people. This aesthetic disappearance is intentional and a gesture of refusal

concerning the visual element. ”Disappearing is the order of the hour“ says Steidl and implies a position of

the glinting, smug artist who throws himself glamourously into the discourse of attention. Yet he not only

celebrates this own ambivalence in this almost post-structural prime subject, he also wants it to appear

prominent, to palm off the ”litter“, to creep in and dodge the fare - indeed during the "Kontracom 06",

a festival for contemporary art and music which ran in Salzburg’s  old city centre from 12th May to 16th

July and was curated by Max Hollein and Tomas Zierhofer-Kin. Visual art in public spaces was represented

by ten international artists. Kontracom for the artists, assigned with the claim,  meant representing public

space now, a cultural transfer which was long overdue in Salbzurg and which was, nevertheless, quite simple

in the way the ”drop sculptures“ were implanted. This means an exemplary impetus of how art and culture

has always been debated in Salzburg was visible. It was dominated by the never-changing image transfer of

a representative economical logic of protecting the highly cultural  exceptional position.  This appropriation

strategy was similar to a subersive acquisition of symbolic art activity and curatorial capital which also actually

paid off: "Laocoön‚s litter "  was identified with Kontracom by a lot of the media and also the general public.

 


Nest and Light

 

There are eggs in the nest and it is initially thinkable, hoped and expected that something will hatch out of

them, promising new banks of life and the unkown. Yet, no sooner has this optimism set in, you notice that

you have fallen into a perfidious thought trap and the mental backlash does not have any effect. You become

aware that it is about ostrich eggs and ostriches cannot fly, it could never get up there so nothing can be

hatched. It is a simple pragmatic impossibility per se and an illusion at the same time an.

Yet there is still a further metaphor of hope, the light which could function as a hatchery heater or an accelerator

of processes. Light,  which is often understood as a metaphor of truth or enlightenment  in modern  paradigms.

Light and sight, concepts which have been demystified for a long time and a code of an occidental brutal rationality

and symobl of an illusion of power and control. With this theory in consideration, the light of 9.10 a.m. to 9.10 p.m.

also burns, that is during the day i.e. when you don‚t actually need it, either up on the art mountain or down in the

cultural square. This reversal and dialectic of light in this non-space exposes the positions of over and under, being

on the edge, discarded, non-visible, a topic of debate and poses the question regarding the possibility of space

beyond the known variables.

 

Ambivalence

 

A further central feature of the installation is the dialectic of the levels of view marked by its location. It could almost

be seen to be trivial: what can be seen from above is not perceptible from the ground and vice versa. From below,

the nest and from above, the eggs. Each opposing feature can only be imagined. For the artist, it is a one-dimensional

possibility, the different levels are readable codes for the utopian formula of the multi-sided perspectives in philosophy

and sociology  and the simultaneous impossibility for the eye which can not see itself : An allusion to the view in relation

to the location and the often fatal, humanitarian sociological consequences contained within it. Yet as a programme,

these levels of viewing are closely linked with a slip of the levels of perception and meaning which is like a self rotation

and passing by of possible significance, which disintegrate at the same moment. This rotation of perspectives and

meanings merely result in a certainty concerning the ambivalence of the present situation and the uncertainty within it.

This is the point where the title, full of discourse and narrative, becomes relevant  "Laocoons Wurf". The theory of the

fertile moments of Lessing's visual art which he wanted to verify through the Laocoon group is brought to mind. This

means that the refusal of narrating the concentrated depiction benefits a significant moment that is to say what has

happened previously can still be deciphered and what stands before can be surmised.

This is the central question of the work: what these premises mean for the future or which possibilities and chances still

exist in this cultural setting. That is to say what "opposing worlds" in Salzburg in particular but also concerning civilisations

and situations on a global level in general can still be articulated. He formulates in a pathetically existential way that "Is

there something fertile still possible here in a sort of Franky boy "What a wonderful world" way, or do these total social

constellations mean the absolute blow of death of a culture?" Yet in the next moment, sublime discourse, artistic gestures

of  prophets and warnings, ironic, existential statements and rejecting own semantic, he explains that he actually lives

here and actually needed light for having a barbecue on the roof. this has a similar motivation such as placing a garden

gnome in front of your own house with it there is a sort of accompanying cynicism but also the occupation of public space.

By questioning the status of art and the significance of  its own majestic dignity  a possibility of providing a meaning in the

area of natural history , the nest could be read as an advertisement for the closely located  "Natural Museum" or, with a little

bit of imagination, as a refusal of anthropocentrism and with it beyond the human authorship it could be imaginable that birds

a have simply made themselves at home on top of the street lamp. However, these are programmed mis-understandings,

mind you, not in a hermeneutical way but thought as  post-structural premisses of constructs of significance where the sense

floats freely. The steidler game invites you to experience the irony of meanings not only the one and often ordered meaning

renews a basic and more frequent distrust but at last another own assuredness, an own  train of thought and this with

epistemological  and power theoretical justifiability.

 

 

 

index

 

  

© 2006 Johannes Steidl  All Rights Reserved  Phone: +43 699 8133 8339  Email: johannessteidl@yahoo.de